Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC с датами от 13 Sep 13 18:57:24 до 15 Nov 24 00:30:01, всего сообщений: 7128
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 6879 из 7128 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC =
От   : Rob Swindell                     1:103/705          26 Mar 23 20:06:30
Кому : Michiel van der Vlist                               26 Mar 23 20:06:30
Тема : en v▀lsmakande liten bit
FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=32344.ftsc_pub@1:103/705+2886bc8e
На   : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/5555+641f427f
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP437 ==================================
==============================================================================
  Re: en v▀lsmakande liten bit
  By: Michiel van der Vlist to Kurt Weiske on Sat Mar 25 2023 07:40 pm

> Hello Kurt,
>
> On Saturday March 25 2023 09:29, you wrote to me:
>
>  KW> I'm surprised Fidonet didn't specify UTC (or some USA time zone) for
>  KW> all of Fidonet, given the ZMH requirement back before continuous mail
>  KW> was possible.
>
> I will go further than that: the founding fathers made a serious mistake by
> using local time instead of UTC - or GMT as it was called back then. There
> has always been a large overlap between the HAM community and the Fidonet
> community. When I became a HAM in the early sixties of the previous century
> HAMs already used GMT when logging contacts and exchanging QSL cards. It
> makes sense when using a medium that does not stop at national borders and
> time zones.
>
> While it may not have been clear that Fidonet would quickly become a global
> thing, it would have been clear that it was never limited to one time zone.
> And while Tom Jennings was not a HAM (AFAIK) my intelligent guess is that by
> the time Fidonet had reached 50 nodes, about half of the sysops were HAMs
> and it would not have been too late to make the change from local time to
> GMT.

Each message can specify the date/time and zone which can be converted to/from UTC if desired by the receiving system. If the sender prefers, they can just use UTC (which I agree, should have been the assumed-default when no timezone header was included).

Like NNTP articles, it's really up to the sender as to how they want to represent the date/time of the message they're sending, but it should always be easily converted or compared with a local timezone of a reader.
--
                                            digital man (rob)

Rush quote #71:
He's not concerned with yesterday, he knows constant change is here today
Norco, CA WX: 54.9°F, 44.0% humidity, 0 mph ESE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.048612 секунды