Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC с датами от 13 Sep 13 18:57:24 до 01 Aug 24 00:39:47, всего сообщений: 7127
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 3081 из 7127 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC =
От   : Bill McGarrity                   1:266/404          07 Nov 17 06:26:11
Кому : mark lewis                                          07 Nov 17 06:26:11
Тема : Re: Routing...
FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=3464.2ftscpubl@1:266/404+1b31f6ee
На   : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:3634/12.73+56cbc6b3
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ==================================
==============================================================================
-=> mark lewis wrote to Bill McGarrity <=-

ml> 22 Feb 16 14:49, Accession wrote to you:

BM>>>> OK... so in sbbsecho.cfg I can just have a ROUTE_TO 1:xxxx/xxx
BM>>>> 1:xxxx/xx.* with no need to play with binkd.... :)

Ac>>> Correct. As long as you have the .0 (boss node) address in your
Ac>>> binkd config.

ml> yes, and as mentioned later, if you are using the distributed binkd.txt
ml> or are creating your own, that .0 boss node should be available...

Which I do.

BM>> If I'm using sbbsecho to route it to the boss node, why would I need
BM>> the boss node's address in the binkd.cfg?  Wouldn't sbbsecho create a
BM>> .cut using the boss nodes address which binkd will understand?

Ac> If you're using BINKD.TXT I don't suppose it would be an issue, since
Ac> you would basically have an unsecure (passwordless) session defined in
Ac> binkd's config anyways.

ml> right... the main thing is to make sure that you have sbbsecho
ml> configured to route a message to a point to its boss node /unless/ that
ml> point has a connection with your system... in that case, you will have
ml> an entry for that point already set up...

Which I just added to my sbbsecho.cfg

Ac> Either way, some kind of link for that bossnode would have to be
Ac> somewhere in binkd or you would have to be using binkd.net for
Ac> lookups, otherwise it would have no idea who or where to poll.

ml> depending on the operator's routing configuration, it may go routed to
ml> their echomail feed... that is if sbbsecho's 1:ALL format also covers
ml> points or if one has to specify 1:ALL/ALL.ALL... this also in
ml> conjunction with the message's own FTN control attributes which may
ml> specify (eg) DIRect which then overrides any routing and requires that
ml> the point either poll for the waiting mail OR there is an entry in a
ml> binkd.txt type of list with connection details for the destination
ml> point system...

ml> once the mail is packed, the destination is set in BSO type mailer
ml> systems... external tools like bonk and son-of-bonk were created to
ml> handle the rerouting of mail in BSO environments...

ml> this is where dynamic mailers shine compared to BSO type "blackhole"
ml> mailers ;)

Agreed. Frontdoor is so much easier but I'm sure I got it working... :)

Thanks...


--

Bill

Telnet: tequilamockingbirdonline.net
Web: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net
FTP: ftp.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:2121
IRC: irc.tequilamockingbirdonline.net Ports: 6661-6670 SSL: +6697
Radio: radio.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:8010/live


... Look Twice... Save a Life!!! Motorcycles are Everywhere!!!
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.50
* Origin: TequilaMockingbird Online - Toms River, NJ (1:266/404)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.072101 секунды