= Сообщение: 3092 из 7127 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Bill McGarrity 1:266/404 07 Nov 17 06:26:11 Кому : Sneaky 07 Nov 17 06:26:11 Тема : Re: Small test for bill FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=3663.2ftscpubl@1:266/404+1b4cf681 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=36502.sync_sys@1:103/705+1b4cf103 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ================================== ============================================================================== -=> Sneaky wrote to Bill McGarrity <=-
IS> Just testing my route.rex
BM> this looks fine... but you're back to the old version of sbbsecho.
Sn> Yes I am for 2 reasons
Sn> 1 if I use Sbbsecho ver233 the seenby/path nealy right but not quite Sn> but I cannot use fd2ftp with it, it wont move the echomail pack to Sn> my link mail box, I have to use xtree to maunual move it there Sn> as so if I don't use fd2ftp and use route.rex which I want to do Sn> when I run irex it sends the .msg packet but wont send the Sn> echomail pkt
As I stated, yuo do not need to create a mail box for each node. sbbsecho, using FD/Attach will create a *.msg with a file-attach of the pkt # that is placed in your outbound folder. No need for multiple folders. You will need to tell sbbsecho where that outbound folder is located as well as Irex. You trigger an event, Irex will see the *.MSG for that address and the pkt that's sitting in your outbound folder will attach itself to that MSG.
Sn> 2 if I use the version before 233 My seen-by/paths are bad Sn> but route.rex sent msg plus echomail pkt fine it works per Sn> this reply
Do as I say above. I've also created a binkd.cfg file for you here. It will need some editing for path statements on your part but it should get you going with binkd. if you want it let me know.
