= Сообщение: 1392 из 7127 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Carol Shenkenberger 1:275/100 20 Oct 14 21:40:14 Кому : Alexey Vissarionov 20 Oct 14 21:40:14 Тема : FTSC-5001 question FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=4174.ftsc_pub@1:275/100+18aaffcc На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:5020/545+5444813c = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP866 ================================== Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/5003.4+54462b9e ============================================================================== Re: FTSC-5001 question By: Alexey Vissarionov to Paul Quinn on Mon Oct 20 2014 07:22 am
AV> 20 Oct 2014 08:55:38, you wrote to Nicholas Boel:
AL>>>> That way BBS callers on port 23 get right to the BBS and mail can AL>>>> still come in via telnet at the same time. NB>>> That's exactly what I was asking and the direction I was going with NB>>> what I had posted. Thank you for the confirmation on that! PQ>> My shortcoming now: I _think_ that ports specified in MBSE's config PQ>> cannot be re-used between BBS & mailer functions.
AV> s/cannot/should not/ ?
I think he means should not be. Else you get a conflict and potential lack of pass from mailer to BBS. He says he current MSBE can not be shifted toaccomodate that issue hence he has a design flaw to work on.
