= Сообщение: 1693 из 7125 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Carol Shenkenberger 1:275/100 03 Jan 15 21:11:28 Кому : Nicholas Boel 03 Jan 15 21:11:28 Тема : Re: Keeping matters on topic in here FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=4461.ftsc_pub@1:275/100+190de8bd На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:154/701+54a56fd4 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP866 ================================== Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:154/701+54a93a19 ============================================================================== Re: Re: Keeping matters on topic in here By: Nicholas Boel to Carol Shenkenberger on Thu Jan 01 2015 09:49 am
RC> Hello Carol,
RC> On 31 Dec 14 19:54, Carol Shenkenberger wrote to Nicholas Boel:
CS>> Pretty much the only one of 'note' was one that has been in use for CS>> 10 years but was never risen to a standard and finally (with a split CS>> vote) relegated to the reference library.
CS>> It's the automated point assignment system, used almost exclusively CS>> by western Europe and only parts of that. It was 4 or 5 for FTS (in CS>> current use) and 6-7 for FRL (too little use I think was the main CS>> reason they stated). Smile, I lost that vote if wondering as I've CS>> supported it but I grant it has a small usership and always has.
CS>> That it shifted in documentation to FRL doesnt mean the aooroved CS>> flags or software have gone away. Only that a new author with new CS>> ideas isn't expected to try to be compatible with the existing CS>> method. They can use the data in the reference library if they wish CS>> or start with a blank slate.
CS>> There is another one on FTN address formatting but it is still under CS>> discussion and as far as I can see, it is redundant as all the info CS>> in it is covered elsewhere already. At least i didnt see anything CS>> not covered elsewhere and no one else has pointed out something in CS>> there only. If we find something, maybe we can move that line or so CS>> to one of the existing spots to pull things together a bit better.
NB> It seems you are one of the very few interested and willing to discuss NB> FTSC related matters with the rest of the public that aren't a part of the NB> seemingly secret society. Thanks for that.
Smile, no worries. There is little happening really. I had not noted that the new release notes were not crossed to here but that can be fixed easily.
Several were posting them in the FTSC echo and we can ask one to cross post to here as well when a new one is hatched out.
They now release them with the replace key but archive the earier versions at the main web site. If you want the older versions, they are still there. Generally it's just 'who's who in the zoo' that needs to be replaced and older versions are not that critical except for historians.
Sporadically we see notes on code pages or BinkP but none ready for prime time yet best i can tell. Not bad stuff, just still a bit of a work in progress.
