= Сообщение: 2987 из 7127 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Bill McGarrity 1:266/404 04 Mar 17 17:43:00 Кому : Accession 04 Mar 17 17:43:00 Тема : Routed netmail FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=6596.2ftscpubl@1:266/404+1d209c54 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=723:1/1+58bab483 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ================================== ============================================================================== Hiya Nick..
-=> Accession wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-04-17 06:29 <=-
Ac> On Fri Mar 03 2017 21:10:20, Bill McGarrity wrote to Digital Man:
BM> I know I'm being a pest lately but one quick question. Is there a BM> switch or an entry in sbbsecho.ini that will relay incoming routed BM> netmail from a downlink meant for another downlink to go through the BM> HUB. It seems I have one stuck in in ../sbbs/netmail folder bound for BM> another address.
Ac> If there is no link information for that address, and no route Ac> information (whether it be a wildcard or direct), it will not go Ac> anywhere. For example, if you receive a routed netmail for 123:456/789, Ac> you would either have to have a direct link setup for that node, or a Ac> wildcard (ie: 123:ALL routed to 123:1/1).
I have a direct link setup in echocfg to all my downlinks. The netmail came in from 24:110/1 and was addressed to me at 24:100/1. The HUB has both addresses as linked nodes.
Ac> Take a look at the destination address of the netmail stuck in your Ac> netmail folder, and make sure you have it routed somewhere, or if you Ac> have a direct connection to it, that there be a direct setup for that Ac> specific address.
Ac> If it's a point, and you have a direct link setup with the boss node, Ac> you have to change that direct link to the boss node to actually route Ac> the points under it to it also.
