= Сообщение: 2989 из 7127 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Bill McGarrity 1:266/404 06 Mar 17 15:03:00 Кому : Digital Man 06 Mar 17 15:03:00 Тема : Routed netmail FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=6606.2ftscpubl@1:266/404+1d231832 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=39513.sync_sys@1:103/705+1d237288 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ================================== ============================================================================== -=> Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-06-17 09:53 <=-
DM> Re: Routed netmail DM> By: Bill McGarrity to Digital Man on Sun Mar 05 2017 11:46 pm
> -=> Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-05-17 17:50 <=- > > DM> Re: Routed netmail > DM> By: Bill McGarrity to Digital Man on Fri Mar 03 2017 09:10 pm > > > Hiya DM... > > > I know I'm being a pest lately but one quick question. Is there a switch > > or an entry in sbbsecho.ini that will relay incoming routed netmail from > > a downlink meant for another downlink to go through the HUB. It seems I > > have one stuck in in ../sbbs/netmail folder bound for another address. > > DM> Is the destination address one of your links? > > Yes... > > All nodes within Sportnet are setup in HUB's echocfg's Linked Nodes area.
DM> And "HUB" is where the netmail message is currently sitting? If so, DM> just running 'sbbsecho' with no argument should packetize and export it DM> unless it has some attribute flag preventing it (e.g. local, sent).
As per the log, it has an 'Already Sent" flag set. I tried using the -j switch and still the same Why was it originally received and not resent to the proper node to begin with? (From: 24:110/1 to 24:100/1). Both of these nodes are listed in sbbsecho.ini. Should there be a master ROUTE-TO statement?
Here's the log running ./sbbsecho without any switches..
