= Сообщение: 2991 из 7127 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Bill McGarrity 1:266/404 07 Mar 17 10:44:00 Кому : Digital Man 07 Mar 17 10:44:00 Тема : Routed netmail FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=6618.2ftscpubl@1:266/404+1d243243 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=39526.sync_sys@1:103/705+1d24232e = Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ================================== ============================================================================== -=> Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-06-17 22:27 <=-
DM> Re: Routed netmail DM> By: Bill McGarrity to Digital Man on Mon Mar 06 2017 05:21 pm
> -=> Digital Man wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-06-17 13:09 <=- > > > > Why was it originally received and not resent to > > the proper node to begin with? (From: 24:110/1 to 24:100/1). Both of > > these nodes are listed in sbbsecho.ini. Should there be a master > > ROUTE-TO statement? > > DM> If you want to route mail between linked-nodes, yes, you need route-to > DM> statements to that effect. > > OK.. guessing here.... but could I use: Route-To 24:24/1 24:All > > And just add it to the sbbsecho.ini file at the bottom?
DM> No, that's not the syntax. Something like this would work however:
DM> [node:24:ALL] DM> Route = 24:24/1
DM> Or just use echocfg and add the "24:ALL" node in echocfg->Linked Nodes DM> with "Route To" set to 24:24/1.
