= Сообщение: 2929 из 7125 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Bill McGarrity 1:266/404 14 Jun 17 13:40:00 Кому : Daryl Stout 14 Jun 17 13:40:00 Тема : sbbsecho FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=6993.2ftscpubl@1:266/404+1da6c8d8 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=39909.sync_sys@1:103/705+1da68cb7 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ================================== ============================================================================== -=> Daryl Stout wrote to DIGITAL MAN on 06-13-17 17:58 <=-
DM> > When I run SBBSECHO -LINF, it complains "unrecognized internal code, ssu DM> > passthrough".
DS> I've gotten the same thing. I was told the other day that SBBSECHO DS> 3.00 was a FLO mailer ONLY, and that the Attach option did not work DS> right...so, I went in, and made changes. I gather the syntax is -LINF DS> for exporting, and -LESR! for importing, correct??
You no longer need to use the 'options'. Just use sbbsecho alone. One suggestion. If you're running htick, you're going to have to use the -d option. This will prevent the deletion of incoming netmail as to allow it to process any filefix requests.
DS> What I did with the AREAS.BBS (in c:\sbbs\data) was set up an DS> internal tag for all the FIDONet style areas, since some of the "tags" DS> from other networks are identical. So, in mine, it looks like this DS> (I'll use the FIDONet Region 19 Sysops echo as an example):
DS> FIDONET-R19SYSOP R19SYSOP 1:261/38
In the Fidonet Group box, what did you put in for the Internal Code? In order for the above to work, FIDONET- would be needed and in the Sub Group, under 'Short Name', R19SYSOP. When you export to your areas.bbs file, just tell it your uplink, in this case Janis and either overwrite or append. Personally, for my Internal Code, each network has a #. Fidonet is #1 so my areas.bbs entry would look like this...
DS> Yet in checking the log file, it seemed that SBBSECHO wasn't DS> processing outgoing packets right, if it had the internal tag, specific DS> to the BBS...and I thought I'd need 2 different AREAS.BBS files, but DS> that doesn't seem necessary. In other words, the first entry and the DS> second entry were identical...but as of now, they look like what I DS> noted above.
DS> Also, I tried using the ZIP and UNZIP, but was getting messages that DS> they didn't know how to handle the packets (I assume done with DS> PKZIP/PKUNZIP). Along that line, I have registered copies of 2.04g and DS> 2.50 -- which would be better?? I also disabled the other archivers for DS> now, but I could put them back in, below ZIP, if it's necessary.
Do you have ZIP and UNZIP in your ../sbbs/exec folder or in your PATH tatement?
