= Сообщение: 3800 из 7440 ============================================= IPV6 = От : Nicholas Boel 1:154/10 30 Nov 16 19:30:00 Кому : Michiel van der Vlist 30 Nov 16 19:30:00 Тема : Cable modem change FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=1:154/10+583f84ed На : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+583f7506 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: UTF-8 ================================== Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+58400c97 ============================================================================== Hello Michiel,
On 01 Dec 16 01:33, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Nicholas Boel:
MV> The following comes to mind. I have been assigned a /56. So I can have MV> 256 Iv6 subnets. But... I have not as yet discovered a way to use MV> anything but the first /64 of that assigment with my modem/router. How MV> about you?
I have no idea what my ISP assigned me, though quick searches of the TWC forums seem to mention a /56. But it seems my router is only giving me a /64 as well. Granted, I'm using the "Native" connection type, and also using DHCP-PD. If I disable either one of the two, I am able to input my own data and request different sized prefix lengths. Since I don't really see a reason at the moment to need 256 subnets for less than 20 devices.. I probably won't dive into it much further at this time.
MV> You get that speed on both IPv4 and IPv6?
Looks like my IPv6 speed test is a little bit faster. 61.2mb/s (IPv4) vs. 62.5mb/s (IPv6). Not really much of a difference, but looks like I do indeed get that speed on both. This was also tested on ipv6-test.com/speedtest and the nearest testing location for me was in the UK.
MV>>> Like that the web interface of the modem is not reaceable via MV>>> IPv6. So this box is not usable in an IPv6 only environment...
I don't think I've ever even tried this. While my router has it's own IPv6 address, I can't seem to connect to the router's web config via IPv6 either.
MV> I have tried them all. The web interface only responds at IPv4. No big MV> deal. Yet... But of course in future equipment should be manageable MV> via IPv6.
I'm sure it will. But as long as the router handles dual stack, it's most likely not an issue. If "please.send.me.somewhere.cool" was a viable address, even that could be used to access your router inside your LAN.
Regards, Nick
... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю." --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20160827 * Origin: thePharcyde_ distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)
