On 03 Dec 16 15:02, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Richard Menedetter:
MV> Seems to be part of their exit strategy. No new users, no new tunnels MV> and when a POP provider stops, the tunnels running through that POP MV> are terminated.
Is there a difference between how SixXS operated compared to he.net? Meaning, it seems as though he.net makes money on this whole ordeal. They are in fact a DNS provider as well as a hosting facility.
MV> There are 15 nodes in IPV6.IP6 running an he.net tunnel. If he.net MV> were to go as well, that would heva a serious impact on the Fidonet MV> IPv6 vommunity. Fortunately I see no signs of he.net handing in their MV> dinner pail yet...
I thought he.net started out as a DNS provider and hosting facility. With the free IPv6 stuff, it lured many people to leave their current providers and go with he.net. So if that's the case, I can't see he.net going anywhere any time soon either.
Did SixXS do it this way? If not, and it was always a free service with no income, I can see why the guy got bored with it.
Regards, Nick
... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю." --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20160827 * Origin: thePharcyde_ distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)
