Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции IPV6
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции IPV6 с датами от 31 Jul 11 14:37:00 до 03 Oct 24 21:46:09, всего сообщений: 7440
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 1254 из 7440 ============================================= IPV6 =
От   : Nicholas Boel                    1:154/701          26 Feb 15 17:32:16
Кому : Markus Reschke                                      26 Feb 15 17:32:16
Тема : Re: Help?
FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=1:154/701+54efaeb9
На   : area://IPV6?msgid=2:240/1661+54de3eb6
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: UTF-8 ==================================
==============================================================================
Hello Markus,

On 26 Feb 15 11:29, Markus Reschke wrote to Nicholas Boel:

NB>> So according to the above, I shouldn't have two addresses, right?

MR> No, that means PE isn't the cause of your two addresses.

Okay.

NB>> scopeid 0x0<global>
NB>>         inet6 fe80::207:e9ff:fe49:6711  prefixlen 64  scopeid
MR>                          ^     ^^ ^^

MR> This is the MAC based EUI-64. You have a fffe in the middle and the
MR> 2nd bit of the first byte is set.

Yup. But why it my machine making the associated v6 address a temporary one and giving me another address entirely?

MR> Another cause for the two public addresses could be a broken
MR> configuration of SLAAC and DHCPv6.

I'm not exactly sure where I would have done that. I use a basic dhcpcd, meaning I haven't changed anything. And my router doesn't seem to be forcing v6 addresses at me, and I haven't configured it to do so whatsoever. I use a he.net tunnel, and have opened a couple ports for my BBS/mailer/server machine for one specific v6 address (the one that uses my MAC address.

So with that said, I'm completely confused as to why I have two addresses on that machine when I didn't configure anything to do it. It seems my Archlinux VM has had the same single v6 address ever since I started toying with it. Seems to me that my Gentoo machine is trying to deprecate the MAC-based v6 address and use this new one..?  I don't want it to do that! :)

Regards,
Nick

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20130910
* Origin: thePharcyde_ telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (1:154/701)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.034602 секунды