= Сообщение: 1827 из 7440 ============================================= IPV6 = От : Tommi Koivula 2:221/360.3001 03 Nov 15 20:49:40 Кому : Michiel van der Vlist 03 Nov 15 20:49:40 Тема : Re: Ziggo & DS-lite FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:221/360.3001+d99094f3 На : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555.0+5637fce8 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: UTF-8 ================================== Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+5639244d ============================================================================== From: Tommi Koivula <sysop@f1.n221.z2.rbb.dy.fi>
On 3.11.2015 1:01, Michiel van der Vlist wrote:
> TK> This is what I have in my 4G from Elisa. Two choices: > > TK> to use APN "internet" to get natted ipv4 and native ipv6. > TK> to use APN "internet4" to get public ipv4 but no ipv6. > > So basically the same choice. What puzzles me is that since they offer the > choice of a public IPv4 addres at no extra charge anyway, they do not have a > shortage of IPv4 adresses yet. So that can't be the reason for not offering > full dual stack. A full dual stack connection does not consume more IPv4 > adresses than an IPv4 only connection.
The default way is natted. I believe "normal" users don't even know about NAT. They just happily surf the net. That's the way the ISP saves public ipv4 addresses.
> OTOH, 4G is mobile. Running servers on a smart phone is not aal that common is > it?
It's wireless, not necessarily mobile. Running a server fine here. :)
Earlier this year I converted my ADSL to "doublebroadband" as the ISP says, now I have dual-WAN in my main loadbalancing router: ADSL 10Mb + LTE 50Mb.
Native IPv6 with this makes no sense right now because the IPv6 address changes everytime the LTE connection changes. So I'm quite happy with the HE tunnel.
> My guess is that they will follow the trend: IPv6 + natted IPv4 for all new > customers except for those who will pay extra.
