= Сообщение: 1765 из 7440 ============================================= IPV6 = От : Markus Reschke 2:240/1661 03 Oct 15 15:46:10 Кому : Michiel van der Vlist 03 Oct 15 15:46:10 Тема : Raspeberry Pi / SixXS FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:240/1661+56043318 На : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+560fd65e = Кодировка сообщения определена как: LATIN-1 ================================ Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+56105a5b ============================================================================== Hi Michiel!
Oct 03 15:06 2015, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Markus Reschke:
MvdV> Indeed the MAC address gives out some information. I doubt it is MvdV> all that useful for a hacker and if he wants the MAC address that MvdV> he can not entice the system to reveal it in some other way.
It's not about hackers, it's about being tracked by advertising and marketing companies.
MR>> And DNS is no real issue since most are used to DynDNS for quite a MR>> while.
MvdV> Really? I haven't used it in years.. And only for IPv4, never for MvdV> IPv6.
Not everyone got a static IP address inclusive. In Germany you would have to choose an expensive business tariff for that.
MvdV> For a professional that may be an issue. For a hobby server. Mwah.. MvdV> it seldom happens and changing the AAAA record is no big deal..
If you have to do that 3 times within a few weeks, you'd automate it.
MvdV> I wonder what excuse the ISPs have for not simply issuing static MvdV> IPv6 prefixes. Dynamic addresses made sense in the dial up age, MvdV> when a small poool of adresses could be used for many more users MvdV> because they never were on line all at once. That chaged with te MvdV> coming of home routers that usually were left on 24/7 and so MvdV> occupied an IP address 24/7. They needed one address per customer MvdV> anyway.
Germany has a strong privacy law and ISPs are happy to charge you more for a business trariff with a static address/prefix.
MvdV> With IPv6 there never was such an excuse anyway. There is no MvdV> shortage of addresses and there will not be for the foreseeable MvdV> future. Why not give everyone a static prefix?
I fully agree. The best approach would be to set dynamic prefixes as default and let the customer change that to static if he likes to.
MvdV> AFAIK, the Dutch IPSs that offer native IPv6 all issue static MvdV> prefixes.
