Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции IPV6
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции IPV6 с датами от 31 Jul 11 14:37:00 до 03 Oct 24 21:46:09, всего сообщений: 7440
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 3360 из 7440 ============================================= IPV6 =
От   : Markus Reschke                   2:240/1661         10 Aug 16 14:27:34
Кому : Kees van Eeten                                      10 Aug 16 14:27:34
Тема : IPV6 and Netgear
FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:240/1661+57a21f93
На   : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5003.4+57aa3eb4
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: LATIN-1 ================================
Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+57ae55f9
==============================================================================
Hello Kees!

Aug 09 22:06 2016, Kees van Eeten wrote to Michiel van der Vlist:

TL>>> I get a dialog box where you put in the "interface ID", which is the
TL>>> host part of the IPv6 address.

MvdV>> Having to enter only the host part instead of the entire 128 bit
MvdV>> address makes sense.

KvE> No it is confusing. It only makes sense if you only use one subnet
KvE> In my setup it works for 2001:980:42ea:1::.....
KvE> But what about the subnet. 2001:980:42ea:fd::.....

The idea behind the interface part is, that a system may have several prefixes. Might be simpler to grasp for a normal user.

KvE> To me it looks like only hosts on the direct connected LAN can be
KvE> exposed to the Internet. When you think about it. It is probably not
KvE> a bad thing, but it is a limitation that forced upon me. I'd rather
KvE> decide for myself.

It brakes the whole idea of prefix delegation, i.e. the router allows only one large flat network. That's a nightmare from a security standpoint. The vendors of SOHO routers still have to learn a lot about IPv6. And those "IPv6 ready" labels are total marketing BS. Half-baked IPv6 support, broken firewalls, lack of standard features and what have you. At the moment it's simply e-junk, which should be returned to the seller. Sorry for being harsh, but the vendors just need to create a proper web interface for the functions already in the OS (linux) or in open source daemons. It's so <facepalm>. Or they could collaborate with OpenWrt, which is years ahead.

And before I forget to mention it, there are /126 and /127 xfer networks, rendering the interface input scheme from above useless.

ciao,
Markus

---
* Origin: *** theca tabellaria *** (2:240/1661)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.055186 секунды