On Tuesday March 11 2014 20:44, you wrote to Kees van Eeten:
WvV>>> We should create a "wall of shame". ;)
KvE>> Why, most of them never claimed to be supporting IPv6, neither KvE>> have they installed software that could.
WV> If they advertise it through dns, they do so implicitly...
While I agree that nodelisting a host name that has an AAAA record attached, implies advertising IPv6 capability and while I take the position that advertising IPv6 capability when one does not actually have it, is not recommended, I think a "wall of shame" may not be the right way to encourage Fidonet sysops to implement IPv6.
KvE>> Ik think that encouraging people who have software that supports KvE>> IPv6 and have IPv6 access, would be a better job. I have seen two, KvE>> that fill that bill. Four could join, if they upgrade their Binkd.
I can go along with that...
WV> So mabye a "wall of shame" could encourage them to take action to fix WV> this either way...
Not seeing themselves on the list of fame, might do it too...
