= Сообщение: 510 из 7402 ============================================== IPV6 = От : Michiel van der Vlist 2:280/5555 20 Mar 14 22:15:38 Кому : Nicholas Boel 20 Mar 14 22:15:38 Тема : Time warp? FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+532b5ba8 На : area://IPV6?msgid=1:154/701+532a1e70 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP850 ================================== Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=1:154/701+532b807d ============================================================================== Hello Nicholas,
On Wednesday March 19 2014 17:42, you wrote to me:
MV>> - 17:09 [6064] TIME Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:09:05 +0100
MV>> The "17:09" is my local time. Which is CET or UTC+0100
NB> The first time (17:09) does not have a TZUTC, since that is your local NB> system's time.
Indeed, that is my local system time. Which BTW is UTC+0100. (CET)
NB> he second time (16:09:05) is offset with +0100, which NB> makes it the exact same time as your time.
No. The second time is in the same time zone as mine. UTC+0100. (indicated by the 0100 after the 16:09:05. If he is in the same time zone as I, his local time mist be the same as mine. So the 16:09:05 is NOT his local time.
NB> Or am I not seeing this correctly (which I believe is the same way NB> Björn is seeing this also)?
MV>> If the "16:09:05" is your local time too and you are also on MV>> UTC+0100, how can there be an hour difference?
NB> Your system has already made up for the +0100 in your log. His mailer NB> must not be offsetting the time, but is indicating that by placing the NB> UTC+0100 in there. Add that +0100 to 16:09:05 and you get the exact NB> same time as your system's log.
No, ther confusion arises because Argus does not follow the convention of using local time, it displays UTC instead.
MV>> If here is an error, how can it be on my side? The log reports MV>> just what I get from you.
NB> Doesn't seem like an error at all to me. But then again, it could be a NB> bug. ;-)
