= Сообщение: 628 из 7442 ============================================== IPV6 = От : Michiel van der Vlist 2:280/5555 01 May 14 12:45:11 Кому : Scott Little 01 May 14 12:45:11 Тема : test me FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+53622b42 На : area://IPV6?msgid=3:712/848+536108ac = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP850 ================================== ============================================================================== Hello Scott,
On Wednesday April 30 2014 23:58, you wrote to me:
MV>> I am a bit surprised the ISPs down undah don't put more pressure MV>> on it. APNIC was the first RIR to deplete its IPv4 stock three MV>> years ago. By now IPv4 adresses should be scarse in the MV>> ASIAN-PACIFIC region.
SL> I think we got in early while there were still plenty of addresses to SL> go around.
When I ask my ISP when they are going to roll out native IPv6, their standard anwer is "no hurry, we still have plenty of IPv4 addresses to meet the demand". And as far as the fixed line providers go, that may be true. Internet penetration is very high in The Netherlands, almost every household has a broadband connection. The market is near saturation. They aren not getting many NEW customers who need an IPv4 address.
But of course that is only half the story. What they ignore is that:
SL> Developing countries with larger populations/growing SL> markets weren't so lucky. I hear China's been on the IPv6 bandwagon SL> for a while.
Indeed. IPv6 only is rising over there and to reach them I need IPv6.
For the mobile providers the story is different. They do not issue publicly routable IPv4 adresses any more. Mobile devices get a 10.0.0.0/8 or 100.64.0.0/10 address.
I guess not many of the smart phone crowd needs to run servers...
MV>> The brokennes of 6to4 is the main reason why most MV>> OS's/applications first try IPv4 instead of IPv6.
In the case of 6to4....
MV>> Windows normally tries IPv6 first, but if the destination is a 6to4 MV>> tunnel, it only tries IPv6 if Ipv4 fails.
SL> That's rather intelligent of them. *stunned*
I suppose it is their way of saying that 6to4 is not recommended. The same goes for Teredo BTW.
MV>> Forget about 6RD.
SL> What's wrong with 6RD?
It is based on the same technology as 6to4, but it avoids some of the problems. So maybe it is good enough for you.
MV>> I suggest you get a decent 6in4 or AYIYA tunnel from a decent MV>> tunnel broker like he.net or SixXs.
SL> Hurricane don't have any local POPs.
You do not really need a local POP unless you need lots of bandwidth.
SL> Six have one in NZ and they support RDNS, so that might be the way to SL> go. None of the other tunnel providers in Oz do RDNS so they're out.
If you really need SMTP over IPv6 yes. But do your really need that yet?
