Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.

	Введите FGHI ссылку: Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции IPV6 с датами от 31 Jul 11 14:37:00 до 03 Oct 24 21:46:09, всего сообщений: 7440 Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение = Сообщение: 1083 из 7440 ============================================= IPV6 = От   : Michiel van der Vlist            2:280/5555         04 Dec 14 12:00:48 Кому : Björn Felten                                        04 Dec 14 12:00:48 Тема : Is my INO4 node working? FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+5480416b На   : area://IPV6?msgid=2:203/2+547fbb70 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP850 ================================== Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:203/2+54804b80 ============================================================================== Hello Björn, On Thursday December 04 2014 02:40, you wrote to me: MvdV>> As it is, eljaco.se points to the same IPv6 address as MvdV>> felten.yi.org. BF>    But it should *not* point to the same system if you try IPv4. But it does: + 12:00 [2944] call to 2:203/1@fidonet   12:00 [2944] trying 90.231.158.147 [90.231.158.147]...   12:00 [2944] connected + 12:00 [2944] outgoing session with 90.231.158.147:24554 - 12:00 [2944] OPT ENC-DES-CBC CRAM-MD5-0152ece15fca4dfa6bf035168d08eb72 + 12:00 [2944] Remote requests MD mode - 12:00 [2944] SYS West Swedish Net - 12:00 [2944] ZYZ Bj÷rn Felten - 12:00 [2944] LOC Gothenburg - 12:00 [2944] PHN 90.231.158.147 - 12:00 [2944] NDL MO,CM,TCP,IFC,TEL,VMP,BND - 12:00 [2944] TIME Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:00:02 +0100 - 12:00 [2944] VER Tedious/3.211/ binkp/1.0 + 12:00 [2944] addr: 2:203/0@fidonet + 12:00 [2944] addr: 2:203/2@fidonet + 12:00 [2944] addr: 2:20/0@fidonet + 12:00 [2944] addr: 2:2/2@fidonet + 12:00 [2944] addr: 2:203/1@fidonet + 12:00 [2944] pwd protected session (MD5) + 12:00 [2944] done (to 2:203/1@fidonet, OK, S/R: 0/0 (0/0 bytes))   12:00 [2944] session closed, quitting... 2:203/1 has an IPv4 address associated with it and it answers when called. The fact that you do not *publish* that IPv4 address in the sa,e line in the nodelist and that I have to apply some Sherlockism to deduct it, does not make it an IPv6 only system. To qualify for the INO4 flag, it will really have to be an independant system that is not reachable over IPv4, not merely an AKA of your main system that has its IPv4 adddress obfusciated. Cheers, Michiel --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20130111 * Origin: 2001:470:1f15:1117::1 (2:280/5555) К главной странице гейта

Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.052396 секунды