= Сообщение: 1592 из 7440 ============================================= IPV6 = От : Michiel van der Vlist 2:280/5555 07 Sep 15 01:04:04 Кому : Tommi Koivula 07 Sep 15 01:04:04 Тема : IPv6 test FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+55ecc86c На : area://IPV6?msgid=2:221/360.3001+291e9823 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP850 ================================== Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:221/6+55eda6ad ============================================================================== Hello Tommi,
On Sunday September 06 2015 15:32, you wrote to me:
>> The "system" that answers on IPv6 is more than just binkd/OS2. It is >> a combination of binkd running on OS/2 and an IPv6 to IPv4 proxy >> running on Windows. Your "system" is is mixed OS/2-Windows system.
TK> Right. What about IPv4 then.. My OS/2 machine has one and only IPv4 TK> address: 192.168.1.2. There needs to be a NAT router between the TK> Internet and OS/2.
Hmmm... I think you are confusing cause and effect here. What you say is that you need a NAT router because of the 192.168.1.2 address. But it is the other way around. You have the 192.168.1.2 address because you choose to put a NAT router between your system and the Internet. It will work perfectly well if you remove the NAT router and directly connect it to the Internet.
TK> - Linux NAT For IPv4. TK> - Windows Portproxy for IPv6.
TK> What is the difference? ;-)
That IPv4 will work without the Linux NAT and IPv6 will not work without the Windows port proxy.
>> So the netsh proxy runs on a different machine.
TK> The netsh portproxy for incoming traffic is running at the same TK> computer than squid for outgoing traffic.
What I meant is that the portproxy runs on a different computer than the mailer.
TK> Squid and netsh are running on Windows 2003 server. TK> "\\HAL has been up for: 115 day(s), 21 hour(s), 25 minute(s),"
So maybe the port proxy is more stabel on Windows 2003 server than on Win XP.
>> I wonder if I can run a similar proxy on my OpenWrt router...
TK> That would be nice indeed. I know that it is possible to run privoxy TK> on a router. I don't know about inbound v6->v4 thing but if it is TK> possible to do with windows, it has to be possible with linux router. TK> :)
Sure, Theoretically it is possible. The question is if someone already wrote the code and if it will run on my Linksys WRT54GL with OpenWrt.