Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции IPV6
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции IPV6 с датами от 31 Jul 11 14:37:00 до 03 Oct 24 21:46:09, всего сообщений: 7440
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 1592 из 7440 ============================================= IPV6 =
От   : Michiel van der Vlist            2:280/5555         07 Sep 15 01:04:04
Кому : Tommi Koivula                                       07 Sep 15 01:04:04
Тема : IPv6 test
FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+55ecc86c
На   : area://IPV6?msgid=2:221/360.3001+291e9823
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP850 ==================================
Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:221/6+55eda6ad
==============================================================================
Hello Tommi,

On Sunday September 06 2015 15:32, you wrote to me:

>> The "system" that answers on IPv6 is more than just binkd/OS2. It is
>> a combination of binkd running on OS/2 and an IPv6 to IPv4 proxy
>> running on Windows. Your "system" is is mixed OS/2-Windows system.

TK> Right. What about IPv4 then.. My OS/2 machine has one and only IPv4
TK> address: 192.168.1.2. There needs to be a NAT router between the
TK> Internet and OS/2.

Hmmm... I think you are confusing cause and effect here. What you say is that you need a NAT router because of the 192.168.1.2 address. But it is the other way around. You have the 192.168.1.2 address because you choose to put a NAT router between your system and the Internet. It will work perfectly well if you remove the NAT router and directly connect it to the Internet.

TK>  - Linux NAT For IPv4.
TK>  - Windows Portproxy for IPv6.

TK> What is the difference? ;-)

That IPv4 will work without the Linux NAT and IPv6 will not work without the Windows port proxy.

>> So the netsh proxy runs on a different machine.

TK> The netsh portproxy for incoming traffic is running at the same
TK> computer than squid for outgoing traffic.

What I meant is that the portproxy runs on a different computer than the mailer.

TK> Squid and netsh are running on Windows 2003 server.
TK> "\\HAL has been up for: 115 day(s), 21 hour(s), 25 minute(s),"

So maybe the port proxy is more stabel on Windows 2003 server than on Win XP.

>> I wonder if I can run a similar proxy on my OpenWrt router...

TK> That would be nice indeed. I know that it is possible to run privoxy
TK> on a router. I don't know about inbound v6->v4 thing but if it is
TK> possible to do with windows, it has to be possible with linux router.
TK> :)

Sure, Theoretically it is possible. The question is if someone already wrote the code and if it will run on my Linksys WRT54GL with OpenWrt.


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20130111
* Origin: 2001:470:1f15:1117::1 (2:280/5555)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.045444 секунды