= Сообщение: 2100 из 7440 ============================================= IPV6 = От : Michiel van der Vlist 2:280/5555 10 Feb 16 11:25:37 Кому : Björn Felten 10 Feb 16 11:25:37 Тема : Interesting videos from NANOG FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+56bb11d3 На : area://IPV6?msgid=2:203/2+56ba8dde = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP850 ================================== Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:203/2+56bb21ae ============================================================================== Hello Björn,
On Wednesday February 10 2016 02:09, you wrote to me:
MvdV>> Two out of forty two. Not bad, but although Geoff said that MvdV>> 6to4 is very bad, he also mentioned that tunnels in general are MvdV>> bad. Not as bad as 6to4, but still bad. Looking at the list I MvdV>> see that about half of them are using a tunnel.
BF> True. I also noticed that we have four systems using 6RD, that is a BF> wee bit better than 6to4, but not much.
I'd say 6RD is a lot better than 6to4, it is almost as good as a dedicated 6in4 tunnel.
The main weakness of 6to4 is its dependence the servive of third party volunteers that have no relation with their users. 6RD uses the same basic technology but it operates entirely within the ISP's network, thus avoiding 6to4's main weakness.
BF> Sweden's biggest ISP, TeliaSonera, offers only 6RD to it's private BF> customers.
It is better than nothing...
BF> Corporate customers seem to be able to get true, native BF> IPv6 -- at a cost I guess. A real shame!
It seems to me the Swedish ISPs need a kick in the ass...
