= Сообщение: 2325 из 7440 ============================================= IPV6 = От : Michiel van der Vlist 2:280/5555 03 Apr 16 00:27:04 Кому : Markus Reschke 03 Apr 16 00:27:04 Тема : SixXs stops FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+57004889 На : area://IPV6?msgid=2:240/1661+56d19815 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP850 ================================== Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:240/1661+56d19817 ============================================================================== Hello Markus,
On Saturday April 02 2016 19:24, you wrote to me:
MvdV>> Then we need to convince the politicians to give that power to MvdV>> the regulators. Here in The Netherlands, we have the so called MvdV>> IPv6 Task Force. But they are a toothless tiger that fell MvdV>> asleep.
MR> Maybe IPv6 could be squeezed into the net neutrality discussion. If an MR> ISP doesn't forward IPv6 packets it's a violation of net neutrality.
That angle has been explored before. But be careful what you wish for. Some idiot may argue that the same applies to X25, IPX and IBM token ring. Forcing ISPs to support every conceivable protocol under net neutrality would make the cost rise sky high. That would not be in the interest of the consumer.
