= Сообщение: 2615 из 7440 ============================================= IPV6 = От : Michiel van der Vlist 2:280/5555 25 Apr 16 12:06:56 Кому : Markus Reschke 25 Apr 16 12:06:56 Тема : IPv6 problems FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+571df015 На : area://IPV6?msgid=2:240/1661+56d19830 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP850 ================================== Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=1:320/119+571ea335 ============================================================================== Hello Markus,
On Monday April 25 2016 11:20, you wrote to Kees van Eeten:
KvE>> I get fewer lines, as I exclude lines where Hostnames does not KvE>> resolve.
MR> Could be another switch :) But I'm not sure, because a node could have MR> a boken DNS entry today and have it fixed by tomorrow.
So run the script on a daily basis with the DAILYLST.
MR> Actually we would also have to check if a binkd is listening. Same MR> story here, binkd might be crashed today and fixed by tomorrow or the MR> IP address could be wrong. How should we deal with these nodes?
It is not "we" - the Fidonet IPv6 community - that has to deal with this. It is the job of the nodelist clercks to keep tho nodelist accurate and up to date.
But... to get back on topic, you could add another switch; one that looks for the INO4 flag in the nodelist and excludes those nodes. So that IPv4 only nodes do not attempt to call an IPv6 only node.
Or for the more distant future: check against the list of IPv6 nodes, and exclude all others.
OTOH, by the time we have nodes that can not make outgoing calls om IPv4, the list of IPv6 nodes is too big to be maintained in its present form, IPv6 capability will be the default and we will have an INO6 flag to signal the exceptions in the nodelist...
