= Сообщение: 4308 из 7440 ============================================= IPV6 = От : Michiel van der Vlist 2:280/5555 25 Apr 17 12:50:50 Кому : Alexey Vissarionov 25 Apr 17 12:50:50 Тема : IPv6 only node? FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+58ff2bec На : area://IPV6?msgid=2:5020/545+58fee6e9 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP850 ================================== Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5003.4+58ff3b3f ============================================================================== Hello Alexey,
On Tuesday April 25 2017 09:02, you wrote to me:
MvdV>> A literal IPv6 address. And ONLY an IPv6 address. So this node MvdV>> is not reachable via IPv4 and therefore should carry the INO4 MvdV>> flag. Don't you agree?
AV> I don't: INO4 makes some sense only with DNS names.
I disagree. "Dumb mailers" will try to keep connecting as explained in the justification for the flag in FRL1038.001 section 2.
Binkd when on an IPv4 connection, will keep trying to connect to 2:221/10 until the sysop or other software intervenes. Binkd is not smart enough to realize that 221/10 is an IPv6 only node and that it can never connect via an IPv4 only connection. The INO4 flag is still usefull in this case as it allows more intelligent agents to avoid or remdy the above situation.
