= Сообщение: 4680 из 7440 ============================================= IPV6 = От : Michiel van der Vlist 2:280/5555 24 Jul 17 17:26:22 Кому : Tony Langdon 24 Jul 17 17:26:22 Тема : The future of IPv4 (was: vanity mode engaged) FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+59761474 На : area://IPV6?msgid=3135.fido-ipv6@3:633/410+1ddb23b1 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP850 ================================== Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=3138.fido-ipv6@3:633/410+1ddbc6a6 ============================================================================== Hello Tony,
On Monday July 24 2017 21:59, you wrote to me:
MvV>> So you are planning on supporting incoming IPv4 for as long as MvV>> you can. If need be at extra cost.
Just for the record, I would not mind paying a modest amount, such as EUR 10/year, if that would solve my problems.
TL> Ham radio apps at a class lag behind, very few of them actually TL> support IPv6, so there will be somewhat of a need - use IPv6 where I TL> can, IPv4 where there's no other choice.
I am old fashioned. I still use the aether when makinh HAM contacts... :-)
But of course there is my other hobby: Fidonet. Still plenty of IPv4 only legacy software around.
MvV>> I am going the other way. I plan on fasing out IPv4 as soon as MvV>> practical. Dual stack and DS-Lite are transition mechanisms. One [..] MvV>> use of IPv6. But when the IPv6 train really gets on steam, the MvV>> next step would be to discourage the use of IPv4.
TL> That is a sound plan. I'm not able to go there yet, because of thos TL> whole class of IPv4 apps, and some of those being infrastructure, they TL> face similar migration issues that their creators haven't yet started TL> to address. :(
