= Сообщение: 4691 из 7440 ============================================= IPV6 = От : Michiel van der Vlist 2:280/5555 29 Jul 17 16:22:28 Кому : Tony Langdon 29 Jul 17 16:22:28 Тема : The future of IPv4 (was: vanity mode engaged) FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+597c9f4f На : area://IPV6?msgid=3147.fido-ipv6@3:633/410+1dde75e4 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP850 ================================== Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=3149.fido-ipv6@3:633/410+1de24c02 ============================================================================== Hello Tony,
On Thursday July 27 2017 07:51, you wrote to me:
TL> Most ISPs here don't offer static addresses for consumers either, but TL> mine oes.
Here the DSL providers issue static addresses. The cable providers issue dynamic addresses. But they are quasy static. My IPv4 address is linked to the MAC address of my router. If the MAC address changes, the IPv4 address changes. If I change the MAC address back before the lease expires, I get back the old address. IPv6 is still unchartered territory. Couple of month ago we had an unscheduled power outage. When the power came back on, my IPv4 address had not changed. But I got a different IPv6 prefix. Both have been stable since then.
TL>> Almost all of this is IPv4 only. My own remote base TL>> actually has the potential to become IPv6 capable - I would need TL>> to work on a suitable audio transport medium, probably web based. TL>> Control wise, it's already IPv6 capable - I can simply SSH in to TL>> control it. ;)
Coming to think of it, ... that legacy allocation 44.0.0.0/8 reserved for HAM radio is a mixed blessing. It gives the HAMs plenty of IPv4 address space. More than they will ever need. A /28 for every HAM. Active or not. A luxury. But... it also makes them lazy. In Dutch we call this "remmende voorsprong". The success of the French Minitel was a main reason why Fidonet never really got off the ground in France. The same mechanism is slowing down IPv6 penetration in the HAM world. :-(
MvV>> Belgium is world leader in IPv6 adoption with 51%. It does not MvV>> show in Fidonet. :-(
TL> Yeah you guys should be leading the world.
Watch your words. We the Dutch are not "you guys" in Belgium. That's just as bad as calling a Kiwi an Aussie. ;-)
TL> There's certainly a selection. We have coverage here, both myself and TL> my NC have IPv6. :)
Net 280 is also well covered. 12 systems, 5 of which (including the host) are IPv6 capable. 42% IPv6 penetration. ;-)
MvV>> Frustrating indeed. :-(
TL> Yep, this is not new stuff now, it should be pedestrian.
