WV> ▀ÖÒ.OPT CRAM-MD5-c48a96e544fb4a3c5aca5faa4be033ee▀ÖÒSYS Blijf WV> Tonijn▀ÖÒZYZ Michiel van der Vlist▀ÖÒLOC Driebergen, NL▀ÖÒ0NDL WV> CM,MO,IBN:fido.vlist.eu,RPK,NPK,ENC,NC,PING▀ÖÒ%TIME Tue, 8 Aug 2017 WV> 11:23:11 +0200▀ÖÒ"VER binkd/1.1a-95/Win32 binkp/1.1▀ÖÒ2 WV> 2:280/5555@fidonet 2:2/20@fidonet 2:28/0@fidonet
- 08 Aug 11:23:11 [2036] incoming from 2001:1608:10:199:a::208 (60814) ░ + 08 Aug 11:23:11 [2568] Error in getnameinfo(): Der angeforderte Name ist g³l░ + 08 Aug 11:23:11 [2568] incoming session with 2001:1608:10:199:a::208 ░ ? 08 Aug 11:23:42 [2568] recv: connection closed by foreign host ░ + 08 Aug 11:23:42 [2568] done (?, failed, S/R: 0/0 (0/0 bytes)) █ 08 Aug 11:23:42 [2568] session closed, quitting... ░
WV> Ok, that works (for now). But it depends on a (free?) service provided WV> by a third party. And has some limitations.
Yes, it works. Thanks for testing. No, it is not free. Only the first fifty days are free after that it is EUR 5/year for 12 ports.
Yes, it has some limitations. But I think it will work for me.
Depending on a third party - free or paid - is never the optimum solution, but if one chooses IPv4 only, one has to rely on a third party like he.net for IPv6. IPv6 is the future, so in that case I prefer native IPv6 and IPv4 via a third party instead of the other way around.
WV> If you have no choice, it is (very) usefull.
I expect many people will have no choice in the not too distant foreseeable future. Even you with your geek friendly ISP may have no choice some day.
WV> But I don't think I would prefer it over a static IPv4 address right WV> now.
They offer a dedicated static IPv4 too. For a fee.
