Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции IPV6
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции IPV6 с датами от 31 Jul 11 14:37:00 до 13 Nov 24 13:39:53, всего сообщений: 7447
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 7428 из 7447 ============================================= IPV6 =
От   : Michiel van der Vlist            2:280/5555         29 Sep 24 21:27:44
Кому : Dmitry Protasoff                                    29 Sep 24 21:27:44
Тема : List of IPv6 nodes
FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+66f9b035
На   : area://IPV6?msgid=2:5001/100.1+66f97c9a
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP850 ==================================
Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:5001/100.1+66f9d35e
==============================================================================
Hello Dmitry,

On Sunday September 29 2024 17:07, you wrote to me:

MV>> No LO does not mean you MUST refuse all connections from unlisted
MV>> systems. It just means you refuse unlisted connections. Some of
MV>> them, not all of them.

DP> From current nodelist:

DP> LO        Node accepts calls Only from Listed

DP> There is nothing about "some of them", the description is pretty
DP> strict - "Only from Listed". Could you please cite any Fidonet
DP> document along with your interpretation?

Not here, it is not related to IPv6, so off-topic. If you wish to discuss this any further meet me in FN_SYSOP.

[..]

DP>>> Even setting Attack Protection to Disabled + Security level =
DP>>> Off

MV>> Yes, when I disable the IPv6 firewall, incoming IPv6 connection
MV>> are possible. But of course I am not going to do that. Then ALL
MV>> unsollicited IPv6 packets are allowed. No way Jose!

DP> Looks like someone decided to skip proper firewall implementation :(

Indeed. FTH is booming and the competition is fierce. Several competing companies ae rolling it out like a flood. Planting their flag in as many households in as short a time as possible is their first priority. All to be ahead of the competition.

My fiber ISP is Delta Caiway and the connection has been active for just over a year. IPv6 is relatively new to them. Until less than a year ago they were IPv4 only. They are relatively new and so they do not have a large stockpile of IPv4 like the incumbants. They grow fast and so last year they ran out of IPv4 and started putting customers on CGNAT. Then they woke up and realised that they could no longer postphone IPv6. So now they offer IPv6. But as could be expected under these circumstances, they still have to deal with the child's diseases. It is something that all IPv6 advocates - including me - have been saying for years. Don't postpone IPv6 until you no longer have a choice. Because then it will take much more effort and cost much more than when you do it when there is no deadline. We see what happens if you do not listen to that advice.

In theory I could fix it by getting my own fiberglass modem/router but for XSPON they are expensive and there is little choice. Plus that it is not easy to get it running. I just think that the burden of providing a decent modem/router is on them.


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303
* Origin: he.net certified sage (2:280/5555)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.061251 секунды