= Сообщение: 2394 из 7440 ============================================= IPV6 = От : Richard Menedetter 2:310/31 07 Apr 16 20:30:14 Кому : Michiel Van Der Vlist 07 Apr 16 20:30:14 Тема : SixXs stops FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:310/31+5706a85a На : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+57018ea7 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: LATIN-1 ================================ Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+5706ed72 ============================================================================== Hi Michiel!
03 Apr 2016 23:24, from Michiel van der Vlist -> Richard Menedetter:
RM>> I really do not understand why they do not throw in IPv6 in the RM>> mix ... But that is how it is :( MV> I think I can understand it. They are actually thinking ahead. An IPv6 MV> only network is less complicated than a dual stack network. And in the MV> end hat is what we will end up with anyway. So why not go for an IPv6 MV> only core network and as a transtion mechanism offer IPv4 via a MV> tunneling mechanism?
Yeah ... maybe ;))
MV>>> But we want full dual stack. For now at least. RM>> Indeed! MV> As my fellow countryman, ex fidonet sysop and IPv6 Guru Iljitsch van MV> Beijnum remarked in his essays: the transition will be ugly... :-(
And late ;) Wrote mythesis about mobile IPv6 in 2004 ... The IPv6 RFC was quit old even back then ...
RM>> I am at UPC Austria ... this is a DS-Lite only area :( MV> So let me ask you and think about this carefully: how much would it MV> really hurt you to go DS-Lite? How much do you really need a public MV> IPv4 address? If push comes to shove, how much would you be willing to MV> pay for it?
No IPv6 in the office, no IPv6 with many people, and most Fido nodes.
I discussed that very point with the network architect of a big ISP, who was looking into PCP. I told him that offering IPv4 for 1 EUR/month makes much more sense ... I would be willing to pay that to get dual stack. PCP is a very braindead "solution" for DS-Lite port forwarding ...
