Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции IPV6
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции IPV6 с датами от 31 Jul 11 14:37:00 до 03 Oct 24 21:46:09, всего сообщений: 7440
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 4002 из 7440 ============================================= IPV6 =
От   : Richard Menedetter               2:310/31           08 Jan 17 16:15:44
Кому : Michiel Van Der Vlist                               08 Jan 17 16:15:44
Тема : What happens if a power supply lowers the voltage by 90%
FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:310/31+587259ec
На   : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+58724459
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: LATIN-1 ================================
Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+5872bfa7
==============================================================================
Hi Michiel!

08 Jan 2017 14:38, from Michiel van der Vlist -> Richard Menedetter:

RM>>>> But I would only do it if there is no other way.
MV> Here the ISP that issues DS-Lite to new customers, offers the option
MV> of IPv4 only for customers that need a public IPv4 address.But that
MV> can't be a long term solution of course.

It is the same here.
You can call them, and if you are lucky, they will reconfigure your CPE to v4 only.

RM>> They asked about RFC6887 (Port Control Protocol) I proposed 1
RM>> EUR/month to keep the v4.
MV> I might be willing to pay EUR 1 a month for a public IPv4 address.
MV> At least for the time being. I would hope that in a couple of years,
MV> IPv6 will be the dominant protocol and I would no longer need IPv4.
MV> But I fear this will take some more time...

I agree that it will take much more time.

MV> OTOH, when having the choice, I might try DS-Lite and see how it works
MV> for me...

I would not want to burden me with that now.
You can get away without IPv6 currently very well.
Most people have v4 only currently around here.
So going DS-Lite is asking for additional trouble ...
I do not want to burden me with that now.

RM>>  At the moment they do not have either of those options.
MY> I wonder if PCP is really a viable solution.
MY> Only one client sharing the same IPv4 address can have port 24554
MY> forwarded. Which may not be a problem in case of port 24554, but hwat
MY> about the more popular ports? 80 or 25?

That was exactly my reasoning.
Port 24554 should be no issue ;)
But port 80 will be.
So they again need one public IP per PCP customer.
AND they have huge support issues.
Why not hand out public IPv4 instead?

MV>>> My guess is that this may become an option in the future. I
MV>>> don't think I'd want to pay more than EUR 5 or EUR 10 a month
MV>>> for an IPv4 address. Above that I'd give DS-Lite a try.
RM>> This would be waaaaaay out of it for me.
MV> So if you had the choice of accepting DS-Lite and paying an extra EUR
MV> 2 a month, you'd accept DS-Lite?

??? Why would I pay more for a weaker service??
I would be willing to pay to EVADE DS-Lite ;)

Or do you mean pay 1 EUR to get a /56 IPv6 address?
Propbably yes, but only because I am a geek.

CU, Ricsi

--- GoldED+/LNX
* Origin: There's too much blood in my caffeine system (2:310/31)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.050224 секунды