Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции IPV6
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции IPV6 с датами от 31 Jul 11 14:37:00 до 03 Oct 24 21:46:09, всего сообщений: 7440
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 3888 из 7440 ============================================= IPV6 =
От   : Alexey Vissarionov               2:5020/545         06 Dec 16 12:00:00
Кому : Nicholas Boel                                       06 Dec 16 12:00:00
Тема : Cable modem change
FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:5020/545+584680eb
На   : area://IPV6?msgid=1:154/10+584181ec
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP866 ==================================
==============================================================================
Good ${greeting_time}, Nicholas!

02 Dec 2016 08:06:12, you wrote to Janne Johansson:

>>> Very good point. The RasPi only has an incoming ethernet port, no
>>> outgoing.
JJ>> That sentence doesn't really make sense.
NB> Maybe not, but I know what I was saying. My current router has an
NB> incoming ethernet port

Most people call that "WAN".

NB> and 4 outgoing ethernet ports.

Most people call that "LAN".

NB> The RasPi only has one ethernet port.

Have a look at BPI-R1. I have one and really like it.
https://www.aliexpress.com/wholesale?CatId=0&isFreeShip=y&SearchText=BPI-R1

JJ>> It's no problem to run more than one network on top of a single
JJ>> ethernet port, either in nasty ways by just overlaying them
NB> If you want to run your network "in nasty ways" that's your choice.
NB> I choose not to.

So, you may use VLANs then.

JJ>> or with VLANs or tunnels. But the issue mentioned first, it being
JJ>> on the far end of a USB bus means it will have issues with high
JJ>> traffic rates, which makes it somewhat unsuitable for being a
JJ>> router on modern networks.
NB> What kind of "high traffic rates" and how "modern" of a network
NB> are we talking here? If you're on the business end of things, sure
NB> maybe so. But for a simple household network

100 Mbit/s is generally ok, however 1 Gbit/s is much better.

NB> with capped internet speeds?

I don't know (and, honestly, don't care) how the internet access speeds are capped in your country and area, but for me the "capped" speed is something in the 10...50 Mbit/s range. That means, even a device for a "simple household network" should support at least 100 Mbit/s.


--
Alexey V. Vissarionov aka Gremlin from Kremlin
gremlin.ru!gremlin; +vii-cmiii-cmlxxvii-mmxlviii

... GPG: 8832FE9FA791F7968AC96E4E909DAC45EF3B1FA8 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net
--- /bin/vi
* Origin: http://openwall.com/Owl (2:5020/545)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.042516 секунды