Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции IPV6
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции IPV6 с датами от 31 Jul 11 14:37:00 до 03 Oct 24 21:46:09, всего сообщений: 7440
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 3614 из 7440 ============================================= IPV6 =
От   : Tony Langdon                     3:633/410          25 Sep 16 20:40:00
Кому : Michiel van der Vlist                               25 Sep 16 20:40:00
Тема : Re: IPv6 deham01 down (sixxs)
FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2071.fido-ipv6@3:633/410+1c4ce9d1
На   : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+57e79b31
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP866 ==================================
Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:240/1661+57bf44c4
==============================================================================
-=> Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Tony Langdon <=-

MvV> Ik like the positive attitude of seeing it an an opportunity to start
MvV> with IPv6, but the reality is that they are too late. Not only should
MvV> IPv6 have been the dominant protocol by now, it should have een the
MvV> dominant protocol before the world ran out of IPv4 addresses.

True, it should have been done.

MvV> Frankly I am a bit surprised that it took so long for ISP's being
MvV> forced to go CGNAT. It was already five years ago that APNIC officially
MvV> depleted its IPv4 addresses. I'd have expected ISPs to go CGNAT
MvV> earlier. Apparently they still had some in store.

Yes, I think they hoarded while they could.

MvV> Anyway, the introduction of IPv6 should have started much earlier. It
MvV> should have been introduced when there wree still plenty of IPv4
MvV> addresses, so that the bugs could have been ironed out properly before
MvV> the panic emerged. Had it been done properly, we may never have needed
MvV> CGNAT. The world should have been weened off IPv4 and IPv6 only might
MvV> have been acceptable by now.

I agree totally.  It was known for many years that IPv4 would run out sometime
post 2010

MvV> We have the technology, IPv6 capable software is available for Fidonet.
MvV> Tunnels are available for those who's ISP does not provide native IPv6.

MvV> We can do it...

That's why I am doing it. :)

MvV> That's what I meant when I said IPv6 should have been introduced much
MvV> earlier. So that by now all those child diseases would have gone.

I don't know how they managed it. :)  I've never had any issue setting up web
servers for IPv6.


... OK Scotty, NOW!  Detonate and energize!  I mean.......
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.49
* Origin: Freeway BBS - freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.047472 секунды