= Сообщение: 4405 из 7440 ============================================= IPV6 = От : Tony Langdon 3:633/410 02 May 17 13:14:00 Кому : Bj”rn Felten 02 May 17 13:14:00 Тема : Re: Setting up your LAN FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2862.fido-ipv6@3:633/410+1d6d468a На : area://IPV6?msgid=2:203/2+5906b770 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: WINDOWS-1252 =========================== Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+590dabc1 ============================================================================== -=> Bj”rn Felten wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
TL> I'm confused as to how your network is setup (and why). :)
BF> Me2.
BF> I too have one single contact point to the big bad internet and BF> everything behind it is handled locally.
Yep, we agree, though while my network is physically one segment, it actually carries 4 logical networks:
1. Main LAN (10.x) - this is the default network, which all devices are on, most (including all configured by DHCPv4) are only on this network and IPv6.
2. Additional public IPv4 LAN (/29) - this is supplied via a Linux router running OpenVPN. My BBSs have addresses on this network for public access, SMTP, etc.
3. HAMnet (44.x) - I have an allocation of 44.x addresses. Currently restricted to a few hosts on the LAN, until I get around to putting some on the air. Another Linux router manages this feed.
4. IPv6, which comes native on my main Internet connection, and all IPv6 capable devices get an IPv6 address, either static or using SLAAC. In the future, I can see IPv4 simplifying my network. The HAMnet (if still needed) will hopefully one day be carried across IPv6, and the additional public IPv4 adresses may one day be no longer needed. Don't know if I will ever see the day when I'm down to a single IPv6 network with firewalling to support HAMnet equivalent functions on IPv6, but here's hoping. I suspect IPv4 will linger in some form for many years, even if we're all running IPv6 only or DS-Lite at home.
BF> And yes, I know that everybody is telling me that having that single BF> contact point being handled by an old WinXP box is a really bad idea, BF> but it has worked for me for almost two decades now, so obviously it's BF> doable... 8-)
Not what I would do (more for flexibility than security), but since it works, who am I to argue? ;)
... Refried beans? Why couldn't they do 'em right the FIRST time? --- MultiMail/Win32 v0.49 * Origin: Freeway BBS - freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410)
