= Сообщение: 598 из 7442 ============================================== IPV6 = От : Scott Little 3:712/848 30 Apr 14 12:34:24 Кому : Michiel van der Vlist 30 Apr 14 12:34:24 Тема : test me FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=3:712/848+53606133 На : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+53601420 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP850 ================================== Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+5360c112 ==============================================================================
[ On 2014-04-29 at 23:03:32, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Scott Little ]
MV> [2002:cbce:df98::4]... 23:03 [8688] connected + 23:03 [8688] outgoing MV> session with 2002:cbce:df98::4 MV> Welcome to the club!
Thanks!
MV> How about outgoing?
Outgoing I probably won't bother with until either we start getting enough IPv6 only nodes to cause trouble, or until my ISP goes native IPv6 (which will be sometime around the heat death of the universe). Do I remember correctly there being talk about a flag for v6-only nodes?
ATM I'm using 6to4, which for some reason my ISP managed to partially break - it works from some of my IPs but not others (confirmed on their end). How they managed the screw up routing for half the IPs in the same subnet to their own 6to4 gateway is beyond me. Hopefully they don't break it any more.
When I get a round tuit I'll set up their 6RD tunnel as well. I haven't been in a hurry to do that since it doesn't do RDNS, which means I can't do SMTP over it without hitting spam filters, but it'll be fine for the BBS. Since 6RD is their official(ly well hidden) IPv6 Trial{tm} method, so hopefully they won't break that until native v6 happens.
--- There is no spoon. * Origin: sysgod@sysgod.org (3:712/848)
