= Сообщение: 5261 из 7402 ============================================= IPV6 = От : Tony Langdon 3:633/410 18 Mar 18 08:46:00 Кому : Michiel van der Vlist 18 Mar 18 08:46:00 Тема : Re: finaly for me FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=406.fido-ipv6@3:633/410+1f12c83f На : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+5aad3387 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ================================== Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+5aae869d ============================================================================== -=> Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Kees van Eeten <=-
MvV> It depends on the definition of "efficient". As IPv6 evangelist, I MvV> prefer a path that avoids nodes that do not support IPv6. In the above MvV> example only two nodes do not support IPv6, so while it is not optimal, MvV> it is not all that bad either...
From a message transfer point of view, IP protocol doesn't matter. Most people would regard timely delivery as the measure of "efficiency". If the fastest path goes via IPv4 or even dialup, who cares? (other than people in this echo ;) ).
That said, I will encourage IPv6 support where possible, and run IPv6 on all of my systems that support it (which is almost everything).
