= Сообщение: 1161 из 7440 ============================================= IPV6 = От : Bill McGarrity 1:266/404 03 Jan 15 18:05:00 Кому : Nicholas Boel 03 Jan 15 18:05:00 Тема : Re: Ipv6 review... FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=629.2ipv6@1:266/404+190dadf8 На : area://IPV6?msgid=1:154/701+54a78ba9 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP866 ================================== ============================================================================== -=> On 01-03-15 00:21, Nicholas Boel wrote to Bill McGarrity <=-
Hiya Nick...
NB> On 02 Jan 15 19:44, Bill McGarrity wrote to All:
BM> I am going to leave my 1:266/404 node strictly IPv4. I am going to BM> contact my NC and ask for another node # to operate strickly IPv6. BM> I've already setup ipv6.tequilamockingbirdonline.net as a AAAA dns and BM> it's working. That's the INA I'll be using. I am going to forget BM> D'Bridge for now and just run binkd as a service stricly for that node BM> and still let IRex handle the IPv4..
NB> Odd thing, your v6 address has changed yet again, even though your NB> ipv6.tequilamockingbirdonline.net is responding.
Michiel questioned the same thing... view the previous post to him.
BM> Will binkd handle both IPv4 and IPv6 and figure out the correct one to BM> use on connect?
NB> Yes. Most definitely. I only use binkd here, and I run dual-stack with NB> IPv4 and IPv6 on the same addresses (I have two nodes with both).
BM> Now, to work on the correct flags for the new node. Being it is IPv6 BM> only, in reading I should tell Mike to also add U,INO4?
NB> If you were to do it that way, then yes (if the U flag is required at NB> all).
Was just confirmed it wasn't but it's going to be moot as I'll be running binkd for both flavors...
BM> One other thing. Should both nodes share the same netmail, inbound BM> and outbound folders? I say yes but I wanted to make sure.
NB> I don't follow on this one. They don't *have* to, but I suppose they NB> could?
BM> As I move along I know there are a few more questions and I'll BM> probably have to bug Rob but this is a good start and I'm getting BM> there.
NB> Rob currently has nothing to do with IPv6. Deuce is the man to talk to NB> about it, as he has made a patch for Synchronet to support it, and is NB> waiting to be able to add it to CVS as soon as Rob is ready for it... NB> or something.