BF> According to Ward it is wrong (see subject line).
BF> According to Kees it's perfectly OK.
BF> My binkd nodelist seems to agree with Kees:
BF> Node 2:201/148@fidonet www.fidoreader.com -
I just tried to make a binkp connection to this node, but couldn't. So unless this is a temporary issue the CM is wrong.
Than there are 2 options:
1) This is the old fashioned deprecated notation for an ION. => Remove the Pvt flag. 2) It's a "real" Pvt node. => The contact designation flags (CM,MO,IBN) can be removed. Or the node should become a point, and be removed from the nodelist (which solves any nodelist issues ;)).
Bye, Wilfred.
--- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)