10 Aug 22 20:17, Bj?rn Wiberg wrote to Bj?rn Felten:
BW> Actually, your 0x4a set me on the right track, as I first thought it BW> was 0x50, and had to re-read some previous messages to get things BW> right. :-D
I still think, that notation from Borland (or from when it came), looks much more fancy. #34... If you put that into questionare - usualy is silently accepted ;-)
Karel
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20180707 * Origin: Plast DATA (2:423/39)