SM>> I will not argue. Some ideas have serious flaws. It is for this SM>> reason SM>> that I ask questions so often.
MvdV> Like I am doing now about your idea of having Ping robots honour the MvdV> @REPLYTO: kludge.
As far as I understand, this cannot become mandatory for them. However, I still see no reason to refuse such an opportunity.
MvdV> 2) Golded's use is for e-mail gating.
Yes. Initially, the idea of using @REPLYTO was for the convenience of using the e-mail gate. However, practice has shown that it is also very convenient inside Fido.
MvdV> It may be useful for that, but e-mail gating is not part of MvdV> Fidonet.
Ok.
MvdV> It does not convince me it is useful, let alone useful for Ping MvdV> robots and certainly not that the usefulness outweighs Murphy art MvdV> 42.
By the way, using this kludge allows you to receive replies from the robot to an e-mail through the gate. And this can also be useful for some sysops.
MvdV>>> 3) Are yuo familiar with art. 42 of Muprpy's Law?
SM>> Everything that cannot happen happens. ;)
MvdV> No. that's art 41. ;-)
MvdV> Murphy's law art 42: If it can be abused, it will be abused,
However, we have not yet figured out if this could be abused. While the answer is - it cannot.