Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции ENET.SYSOP
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции ENET.SYSOP с датами от 10 Jul 13 21:42:12 до 03 May 24 12:02:39, всего сообщений: 12492
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 10287 из 12492 ===================================== ENET.SYSOP =
От   : Stas Mishchenkov                 2:460/5858         10 Feb 21 10:49:38
Кому : Michiel van der Vlist                               10 Feb 21 10:49:38
Тема : Ping
FGHI : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:460/5858+6023926d
На   : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:280/5555+6022643a
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP866 ==================================
Ответ: area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:280/5555+6023e0fa
==============================================================================
Hi Michiel!

Tuesday February 09 2021 11:08, you wrote to me:

MvdV> Of course it can not be made mandatory. Even considering it, will
MvdV> get
MvdV> many feathers ruffled. That you see no reason to refuse an opportunity
MvdV> is not what will get others moving. You will have to convince the
MvdV> developers and their first reaction wil be: "Why should I spent time and
MvdV> energy on it?". So far you have not really provided any reason how this
MvdV> would be useful other than just stating your opinion.

In order to realize myself, my opinion is enough for me. ;) In order for this to be implemented elsewhere, a justification of the reason is certainly required.
In any case, I have stirred up the hive enough to understand how this can be abused. For myself, I have already turned off the ability to change the recipient address of the robot's response. The only thing left is to change the name. This is what I use for my needs.

MvdV>>> 2) Golded's use is for e-mail gating.

SM>> Yes. Initially, the idea of using @REPLYTO was for the convenience of
SM>> using the e-mail gate. However, practice has shown that it is also
SM>> very convenient inside Fido.

MvdV> 1) So you say...

I gave an example of use not for gating. Very comfortably.

MvdV> 2) e-mail gating was useful in the days when not every Fidonet
MvdV> participant had e-mail. In the POTS age I have used it myself. Now in
MvdV> the days of Fido over IP, almost every member of Fdionet has an internet
MvdV> connection and with an internet connection almost everyone has e-mail.
MvdV> E-mail gating over Fidonet is no longer needed.

Of course, for my main workplace, I don't use an email gate. However, this does not mean that he may never be needed again. For example, one of the tg BBS users discovered the ability to send an e-mail and receive an answer to it using just a messenger on the phone.

MvdV>>> It may be useful for that, but e-mail gating is not part of
MvdV>>> Fidonet.

SM>> Ok.

MvdV> So we can forget about e-mail gating in the context of PING robots
MvdV> supportinge @REPLYTO.

Of course, this may be needed in the rare case when a node sysop, being on a business trip, for example, for some unknown reason, wanted to check the performance of his node using such a perverse method. However, I left this option to my ping just in case.

Have a nice night.
          Stas Mishchenkov.

--- Have You daily sexual life? Hide it proper from Your wife! ;)
* Origin: Lame Users Breeding. Simferopol, Crimea. (2:460/5858)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.063932 секунды