= Сообщение: 221 из 12490 ======================================= ENET.SYSOP = От : Carol Shenkenberger 1:275/100 19 Nov 13 20:02:11 Кому : Ulrich Schroeter 19 Nov 13 20:02:11 Тема : Nodelist FGHI : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=4593.enet_sys@1:275/100+16f15204 На : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:240/1120@fidonet+52849e66 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP866 ================================== ============================================================================== Re: Nodelist By: Ulrich Schroeter to Carol Shenkenberger on Thu Nov 14 2013 09:38 am
CS>>>> Grin, the only job of an IC is ... US>>> An IC is not needed (anymore) in the current state of affairs. CS>> I think I agree unless the ZCC wanted to have one, I think today it CS>> ... CS>> Basically we can never have an IC again that works for us all, CS>> unless they are all-zone ware.
CS>> Thats pretty hard to do.
CS>> In today's market, I'd expect an IC to step in ONLY when 2 ZC's had CS>> an issue they could not resolve directly. They would have to be CS>> trusted to see both sides and be impartial.
US> the handling of disputes is layed into the *C structure by policy, US> this works upto the ZC level. But what in a case, a dispute arises between US> two ZC's ? here is a fallback option -> IC US> But as like in every dispute, why not first try to get an answer by US> yourself? Talk together, communicate, and an case there is no answer, US> request assistance by the next higher level ... ZC's? -> search for US> someone who is able to mediate :)
Exactly. As we have 3 active ZC's now, this is not so much of an issue i think.
In today's envorinment, listing any of the standing ZC's to IC would actually CAUSE a problem that doesn't exist. There is too much disparity in style and sizes to make it really work. As a result, we are probably best leaving it well enough alone. xxcarol --- SBBSecho 2.11-Win32 * Origin: SHENK'S EXPRESS (1:275/100)
