= Сообщение: 224 из 12490 ======================================= ENET.SYSOP = От : Carol Shenkenberger 1:275/100 19 Nov 13 20:12:34 Кому : BjФrn Felten 19 Nov 13 20:12:34 Тема : Z2PNT compile state (18.10.2013) FGHI : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=4596.enet_sys@1:275/100+16f15476 На : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:203/2+528b9df2 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP866 ================================== Ответ: area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:203/2+528cc7d6 ============================================================================== Re: Z2PNT compile state (18.10.2013) By: BjФrn Felten to Carol Shenkenberger on Tue Nov 19 2013 06:20 pm
CS>> I firmly belive all traffic for a net should come to the nodes via CS>> the RC to the NC as at least a secondary path (if the site has a CS>> faster one).
BF> Unfortunately our "founding fathers" -- AKA the Z1 RCs who wrote P4 -- BF> decided that the RCs should be excepted from the obligation to pass BF> on netmail.
BF> The only P4 style is node -> NC -> ZC -> NC -> node.
Odd but i've not read P4 in years. I can tell you Z1 has used RC's as part of that mix since before 1989.
