Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC с датами от 13 Sep 13 18:57:24 до 01 Apr 24 01:17:44, всего сообщений: 7124
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 4123 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC =
От   : Fred Riccio                      1:132/174          10 Dec 18 09:04:25
Кому : Ward Dossche                                        10 Dec 18 09:04:25
Тема : Re: FTSC Administrator - preliminary results
FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:132/174+5c0e3060
На   : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:292/854+0f402837
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP866 ==================================
Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:292/854+11263332
==============================================================================
10 Dec 18 14:55, Ward Dossche wrote to Fred Riccio:


FR>>WD> the secrecy of the voting has now been compromised and the
FR>>WD> logical result would be that it is totally invalid.

FR>> There was no promise (or mandate) of secrecy, confidentiality, or
FR>> anonymity in the election rules.

WD> If the vote was not meant to be secret, there was no need for an
WD> elaborate password system

I don't consider it elaborate.



WD> and I personally think the electorate has a
WD> right to know who the voters are without disclosing the actual vote.

See my previous response to you.  If the voters want to make it known, they will.



FR>> That is correct.  Under the rules of this election you have no right
FR>> to contest the results.  I will not be excusing myself.

WD> The absence of the right to contest the result does not disqualify me
WD> from having an opinion.

Your opinion has been noted.


WD> There also seems to be a vote by Sean Dennis which went the way of
WD> the Dodo-bird and vanished. it is not mentioned in any of the
WD> reporting ... this is the 2nd questionable vote.

There must be some back channel I am not aware of....  Sean knows what happened and he knows why.  I notified him via NetMail.  If he wants to discuss it here let him bring it up himself.

Are you trying to bait me into another breach of confidentiality?


WD> I still think the proper thing is to step back and to announce a
WD> rerun with a new, yet to be decided-upon, enumerator.

I hear your opinion, but nothing you have said tells me that the results would be any different.

--- Msged/NT 6.0.1
* Origin: Somewhere in New Hampshire's White Mountains (1:132/174)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.036486 секунды