= Сообщение: 6909 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Maurice Kinal 1:153/7001.2989 14 Apr 23 21:36:28 Кому : Rob Swindell 14 Apr 23 21:36:28 Тема : type 2.2 pkt header FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:153/7001.2989+6439c75c = Кодировка сообщения определена как: UTF-8 ================================== Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=32375.ftsc_pub@1:103/705+289f816f ============================================================================== Hey Rob!
>> RS> and FSC-39 comliant packets as "Type 2e". >> >> That doesn't match any of the Types in the document in question. > Which document is that?
Same as it always was, FSP-1042 draft 7. I only see Type 2, Type 2+ and Type 2.2. Beats me what Type 2e is although I probably have seen a document somewhere describing it, along with a bunch of others that I have never run across in a functional tosser ... yet.
RS> I think the differentiation I've done between FSC-39 and FSC-48 RS> compliant packets is important
For sure but only if it doesn't muddy the waters of compatibilty. There is a big hole that exists that requires patching and I believe that is what FSP-1042 draft 7 attempts to fill.
RS> I'll keep doing comparisons between the docs and my code see if RS> that'll jar it loose.
