AI>> Can you send on of these messages in the e-test area so mark can AI>> see the results and we'll know if anything bad is happening at my AI>> node?
MK> Yes I can but first I'd like to take tonight off.
Take all the time you need, I'm in no hurry but it would be good to get the facts around all this.
MK> Secondly is the format more or less what we're looking for?
Yep, in this case I am just trying to make sure my node isn't doing anything unwanted. We might need to change the format as we move along to where we are going.
MK> Thirdly all three paths of just one at a time? I found the three at a MK> time very confusing and have not gotten a handle on it. Some of MK> mark's quoted characters were tampered with (dropped trailing bytes) MK> even though he claimed they were good at his end. I'd like to cross MK> reference those and see if it was something between that deleted them MK> and not at his end.
If possible (might take some doing) we would want different paths to see how things happen at different points along the road.
MK> I think this might take a little more activity to narrow this down so MK> the e-test echoarea should be the way to go. Also I need to check if MK> I have access to that echoarea from the EuroPoint. Give me a day and MK> I hopefully will be better prepared than I was for this initial test MK> of FTN-ish triangulation. Seems like it should be of assistance.
I think the e-test area is more or less the net 3634 test area, so it's not on the backbone but available to those who link at 1:3634/12 (is that right mark?).
If we could get interested parties linked there (or another suitable area) we could get some facts together.