On Sat Jan 28 2017 12:31:44, mark lewis wrote to Wilfred van Velzen:
WV>> I still don't understand why the numbers need to be explicity WV>> mentioned 1 by 1. These documents aren't ment for 5 year olds! ;)
ml> you may be joking but don't be so sure of yourself... some 5yo youth ml> are pretty decent programmers in their own right... even if they are ml> just getting started...
Agreed.
WV>> Why not just use the FTS-0001 notation: ' = "00" | .. | "59" '. WV>> Isn't that clear enough?
ml> if you're talking about seconds, it is wrong ;)
Yes. FTS-0001 is wrong in this regard. So since I'm supposed to reference FTS-0001, I did. I don't suppose I can change this proposal to reflect anything else until FTS-0001 is corrected, then?
Regards, Nick
... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю." --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20161221 * Origin: thePharcyde_ distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)