= Сообщение: 2275 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Nicholas Boel 1:154/10 29 Jan 17 17:22:00 Кому : Michiel van der Vlist 29 Jan 17 17:22:00 Тема : FSP-1040.001 Draft #3 FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:154/10+588e7b94 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/5555+588e65e5 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: UTF-8 ================================== Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:3634/12.73+588e8dfd ============================================================================== Hello Michiel,
On Sun Jan 29 2017 22:59:36, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Nicholas Boel:
WV>>>> Why not just use the FTS-0001 notation: ' = "00" | .. | "59" '. WV>>>> Isn't that clear enough?
ml>>> if you're talking about seconds, it is wrong ;)
NB>> Yes. FTS-0001 is wrong in this regard.
MV> In what way is it wrong?
So far three things have been found missing and/or wrong with FTS-0001.016.
1) Section B, Missing any kind of "digit" variable, defining a single number, 0-9.
2) Section B, "seconds" variable does not allow for a leap second, which may not be a problem if nothing else allows for it, but it seems the original author of FSP-1040 (which originally reference ABNF) took that into account using zeroToSixty.
3) Section F, The month variable is set to 0-11, and not 1-12. There is no month 0, and would never be used that way. January is month #1, December is month #12.
If everyone wants me to fully reference FTS-0001, and not ABNF, those three (so far, and just for this specific part of the proposal that seems to have issues with a few here) things would need to be resolved.
Regards, Nick
... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю." --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20161221 * Origin: thePharcyde_ distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)
