On Mon Jan 30 2017 10:53:34, Kees van Eeten wrote to Nicholas Boel:
NB>> It still contradicts FTS-0001's "dayOfMonth" variable currently NB>> being 1-31 though. If that thought process is used, it should be NB>> used everywhere, and instead should be 0-30.
KE> In my view the 0-6 is an enumerated list of names, as is the 0-11. KE> With 1-7 and 1-12 there will be a 0 element in the list that is never KE> used.
KE> What you propose for days of the month would be an index 0-30 in to a KE> list of numbers 1-31. There is no need for a list of enumurated list.
With that same thought process in mind, "hours" is already using 0-23, "minutes" are already using 0-59, "seconds" are already using 0-59.
Wouldn't numeral days of the month (as you describe above) be in the exact same category as hours, minutes, and seconds since they are not an enumerated list of names?
Regards, Nick
... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю." --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20161221 * Origin: thePharcyde_ distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)
