= Сообщение: 2306 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Nicholas Boel 1:154/10 30 Jan 17 15:03:00 Кому : Michiel van der Vlist 30 Jan 17 15:03:00 Тема : FSP-1040.001 Draft #3 FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:154/10+588faa23 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/5555+588f62ff = Кодировка сообщения определена как: UTF-8 ================================== Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/5555+5890988d ============================================================================== Hello Michiel,
On Mon Jan 30 2017 16:56:20, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Nicholas Boel:
NB>> Odd that internet RFCs seem to account for a 24th hour, and a NB>> 60th minute and/or second though.
MV> The FTSC documents Fidonet, NOT the InterNet. Refering to RFCs can be MV> helpful, but RFC are never leading. What is leading id Fidonet current MV> practise.
MV> Twist it any way you want, 24 for the hour and 60 for the minutes and MV> seconds is NOT Fidonet current practise. And will never be compatible MV> with Fidonet current practise.
As far as I can tell, everything in the unmodified "Draft #3" I posted covers everything in FTS-0001 and then some. So I would say "current practice" is being documented for both backwards AND forwards compatibility.
Regards, Nick
... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю." --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20161221 * Origin: thePharcyde_ distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)
