= Сообщение: 6335 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Shaun Buzza 1:229/110 12 Mar 22 12:26:36 Кому : Andre Robitaille 12 Mar 22 12:26:36 Тема : Re: 2022 FTSC Standing Member Election - Votes Received FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:229/110+4c7a046a На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=3857.fidonet_ftscpubl@1:154/70+2692187a = Кодировка сообщения определена как: UTF-8 ================================== ============================================================================== AR> > At this point, though, I am wondering why this is so. AR> AR> Because then you’ve have to chase everybody down to vote or you’d AR> never get people elected. AR> AR> For things like a zone coordinator, definitely. Regional, maybe? AR> Standing member, especially if there aren’t enough standing members AR> currently, no way. It’s not worth it. AR> AR> FidoNet is made up of volunteers then put it less effort the lower you AR> go in the hierarchy. You’ve got to take what you can get from people AR> that are willing to put in effort, even for something like voting.
That's a valid point. However, I have always specified 'recieved votes' instead of 'eligible votes'. I've said at least once that a a complete lack of voting should not be considered an abstention, but rather a non-vote.
And again, if there's no majority decision rule, why even mention 'abstain' as an option? I might have had different things to say to my RC during his deliberations, if that had been clear from the start.
